Sunday, March 18, 2007

The Bad Boys of Investing Grow Up

The New York Times



March 17, 2007
Market Values

EMERGING markets have a reputation for being the bad boys of investment. They can be volatile and self-destructive, yet there is something seductive about their rough, unfinished quality and growth potential that keeps investors coming back.

But a lot of these markets have shown during the last few turbulent weeks that they aren’t children anymore. They have avoided much greater falls or wilder swings than Western markets have had, a display of maturity that would have been unimaginable a decade ago.

If certain markets — in places like Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Brazil and Chile — have evolved to the point that they are more emerged than emerging, it could make them more appealing, even if they are less exciting.

Specialists in international investing attribute the newfound stability in what might be called post-emerging markets to a leveling up of economic conditions fostered by the expansion of trade known as globalization.

“Most of these countries are in very good shape economically,” said Arjun Divecha, manager of the G.M.O. Emerging Market fund. “They have massive foreign reserves and trade surpluses. Interest rates are pretty low, and indebtedness at the national and corporate levels is pretty low.”

Governments in many countries on the cusp of developed status are doing what may be the best thing they can for their economies: nothing, or at least a lot less.

“Intervention has diminished a fair amount, and capitalism is being allowed to prevail,” Mr. Divecha said.

Thomas Mengel, manager of the Ivy International Core Equity fund, likewise finds that “a lot of these emerging countries are in a much healthier financial position than they have ever been.”

As the markets continue to mature, the valuation discount with Western markets will shrink, enhancing returns, he predicted. “Over the next five years or so, as these countries continue to get more resilient, we’ll see more expansion” in price-earnings multiples, he said, although he cautioned that “short term, things can always change.”

What has changed in the last month is that stocks in post-emerging markets have become cheaper. A few stocks Mr. Mengel said he finds most interesting include Samsung Electronics and Kookmin Bank in South Korea.

He also highlighted companies in markets that have yet to reach the post-emergence stage, such as Sina, the Chinese Internet portal, and a couple of Indian technology businesses: Satyam and Infosys.

Other beneficiaries of the blossoming of once-emerging economies are Western corporations doing brisk business there. Among Mr. Mengel’s favorites are Vossloh, a German company doing extensive work on China’s rail system; NestlĂ©, the Swiss food producer; and the German conglomerate Siemens.

ONE consequence of post-emergence for portfolio managers is that it permits close comparisons between leading companies in those economies and their counterparts in the West and Japan, said Arjun Jayaraman, a fund manager at Causeway Capital Management, a firm specializing in foreign stock markets.

Often, he said, the companies in the newly mature markets look better. Two examples are Samsung Electronics and another Korean company, Pohang Iron and Steel.

“Posco and Samsung are world-class companies,” Mr. Jayaraman said. “Samsung trades at a cheaper valuation than most Japanese companies and is a better company in many respects. It’s a cheap way to get Asian technology exposure.”

Samsung offers better value than Sony, he said. The same goes for Posco when he compares it with Nippon Steel and the German steel producer ThyssenKrupp.

Post-emerging-market stocks are not always the best options, though. Automakers like Hyundai have come a long way, he said, but he still prefers Toyota, a company that he says makes cars better than Sony makes consumer electronics.

Anyone who has survived adolescence knows that problems don’t vanish. You just get a set of new ones. Post-emerging markets and their corporate champions may have become less susceptible to the economic and political disruptions of the emerging world, but they may be more vulnerable to global economic weakness and to pressure from new commercial rivals.

Still, their recent resilience, modest valuations and steep learning curve suggest that they will stand up better than before when the inevitable shocks and disappointments come along.

No comments:

Lunch is for wimps

Lunch is for wimps
It's not a question of enough, pal. It's a zero sum game, somebody wins, somebody loses. Money itself isn't lost or made, it's simply transferred from one perception to another.