When
will there be a change in the wind? For four years it has blown
investors in one direction: out of stocks and into the relative safety
of bond funds.
But while there are plenty of warnings that bondholders face losses
from rising interest rates, rallying stock markets have yet to be
propelled by a real gust of enthusiasm.
Flurries
of interest in the new year, though, have brought rising interest in
the idea of a ‘Great Rotation’: the idea that money will flow out of
bonds and back into stocks.
US stock funds attracted $21bn in the first four weeks of the year,
according to Lipper, the largest inflow for any four-week period since
the peak of the dot-com boom in April 2000.
Meanwhile equity funds globally took in assets at three times the
pace of bond funds, according to EPFR. The research group also found
that equity flows from retail investors, who tend to be slow to react to
turning points in markets, are on track for the strongest start to the
year since 2006.
The inflows come as some influential bond investors have already positioned themselves to avoid interest rate risk.
“There’s probably a growing understanding that interest rates have to go higher at some point,” says Michael Hasenstab, who oversees $175bn in fixed income for Franklin Templeton. “We’ve actually taken that conviction and put it in place.”
At the same time there are signs of investor optimism. UBS says its
long-only and hedge fund clients were net buyers of equities in
crisis-hit eurozone “periphery” countries in eight of the last 11 weeks,
with average flows at the highest level in more than two years. Unloved
Spanish equities have seen buying for four weeks in a row.
But Nick Nelson, UBS global equity strategist, argues for context.
“It is not a rotation, it is a mini-rotation. It doesn’t look to us that
it’s euphoria or super extended,” he says.
And Romain Boscher, head of equities at Amundi, says that in Europe
it is not as simple as money flowing from fixed income straight to
equities. “This is not new money moving in favour of equities. We’re
just seeing money that left Europe coming back again.”
Indeed, the term is in one sense a misnomer. “Every stock certificate
and bond certificate must be owned by someone at every point in time,”
says John Hussman of Hussman Funds.
Rather it reflects the sentiment at the margin, where new savings are
directed, and increased demand for stocks is still tentative and
cautious.
“We’re still in a world where if there’s a shock to equities, bonds
will do well. So bonds still play an important role as a diversifier. In
five years’ time, who knows, but stocks and bonds stapled together are a
very interesting investment in the near term,” says AndrĂ© Perold, chief
investment officer for HighVista Strategies, an investment firm for
endowments.
Patrik Schowitz, global strategist for JPMorgan Asset Management,
says he is overweighting stocks relative to bonds, but largely because
the latter are so expensive.
“It would certainly help if we had a rip-roaring economic environment,” he says.
Robert Arnott, who runs two asset allocation funds for Pimco, sees
recent moves in the stock and bond markets as opportunities to be
tactical, selling what has rallied and buying what has fallen.
He also says the source of January inflows may simply be the flurry
of bonuses and special dividends paid out in the US ahead of this year’s
tax rises. He describes this as “a flood of demand from income that
would have normally occurred in January, February and March that needs a
home”.
Even were there a greater sense of optimism though, there is much
built-in inertia at big investors such as pension funds and insurers.
Solvency regulations in Europe encourage insurers to hold bonds,
while accounting rules have pushed US pension funds in the same
direction.
“A good two-thirds of corporate pensions have put derisking plans in place,” says senior Mercer consultant Richard McEvoy.
That will continue a trend which the consultancy calculates has
caused pension funds of S&P 1500 companies to cut equities from 65
per cent of assets to 50 per cent over the past decade, while bond
allocations have risen 10 percentage points to 39 per cent.
So the investment weather remains mixed. Looking back over his
44-year investment career, Charles Brandes, chairman of Brandes
Investment Partners, says the current period most reminds him of 1980.
In 1974 the US market dropped 47 per cent. It rallied in the
following two years, but by 1980 interest rates were rising to combat
inflation and the economic outlook remained uncertain. “It wasn’t until
1982 that we saw the start of the big bull market, and maybe we are two
or three years away from that,” says Mr Brandes.
The richest one percent of this country owns half our country's wealth, five trillion dollars. One third of that comes from hard work, two thirds comes from inheritance, interest on interest accumulating to widows and idiot sons and what I do, stock and real estate speculation. It's bullshit. You got ninety percent of the American public out there with little or no net worth. I create nothing. I own.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Lou Manheim's Helpful Links
Lunch is for wimps
It's not a question of enough, pal. It's a zero sum game, somebody wins, somebody loses. Money itself isn't lost or made, it's simply transferred from one perception to another.
No comments:
Post a Comment